<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Handoff Review</title><link>https://workflow-inspector.com/research/</link><description>Research owned by Workflow Inspector. Original evidence, transparent methods, disclosed limitations.</description><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://workflow-inspector.com/research/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Closed is not the same as completed: a public-issue pilot study</title><link>https://workflow-inspector.com/research/studies/public-issue-lifetimes-2026-08/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://workflow-inspector.com/research/studies/public-issue-lifetimes-2026-08/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>A reproducible pilot of 22 August 2026 public issues: 17 closed and 5 still open. Why closure timestamps do not prove completed work or accepted handoffs. Small pilot; not customer outcomes or a representative benchmark.</description></item></channel></rss>